Build AI management system per ISO 42001

Analyze ISO 42001 AI Management System gaps and build risk registers

Compliance teams building ISO 42001 AIMS when gap analysis and audit planning must follow the standard's Clause 9.2 rigor.

• · Current AIMS maturity state (Clauses 4-10 coverage scoring)
• · Existing risk register (if available)
• · Organizational context (team size, industry, risk tolerance)

• · AIMS gap analysis (Clauses 4-10 coverage scores + remediation priority)
• · AI risk register (Annex A 38 controls + risk-to-treatment map)
• · Internal audit schedule (Clause 9.2 cadence + 12-month plan + auditor independence checks)

• · stdlib-only (3 deterministic Python tools, no external APIs)

• · ISO 42001:2023 must be adopted (binding standard for AIMS)
• · Organization must have identified AI systems in scope
• · Internal audit team must exist (or external auditor contracted)

• · Gap analysis may identify unaffordable remediation (org capacity limits apply)
• · Annex A 38 controls can be complex in interdependent systems (may require specialist interpretation)
• · Internal auditor independence can be hard to establish in small teams (flagged in plan, not solved automatically)

• · Direct reference to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 binding standard
• · Clauses 4-10 walkthrough in references
• · Annex A controls A.1-A.10 documented with 38-control count
• · AIMS implementation maturity model included
• · Cross-framework mapping (42001 ↔ EU AI Act ↔ NIST AI RMF ↔ ISO 23894)