Validate research manuscript for publication

g3-readiness-reviewworkflowsetup L2★0

What it does

Conduct adversarial manuscript review

Best for

Rigorously vetting academic manuscripts through multiple independent reviewer lenses before submission, with explicit synthesis of conflicts and prioritized fixes.

Inputs

· [object Object]

Outputs

· [object Object]

Preconditions

All manuscript source files and data files readable; four independent reviewers available (or single LLM with four distinct lenses)

Failure modes

· Incomplete evidence cross-check; claims not verified against cited data files
· Single reviewer bias vs four-lens adversarial approach
· Missing domain expertise for the specific journal (G3 genomic selection standards)

Trust signals

· Schema enforces verdict enum (accept/minor/major/reject)
· Cross-references data files in source code, not just text
· Handling-editor synthesis phase deduplicates and prioritizes