Optimize content for AI search citations
geo-optimizerskillsetup L2★2,106
nowork-studio/toprank ↗Causal-lift measurements
ai-content-optimization+16pp vs no-skill baselinewith-skill 56% · baseline 40%
Measured by running the task with and without this artifact, K=5, graded by deterministic checks — no LLM judging.
What it does
Audit and optimize content for AI search engine citation
Best for
Content creators who want to maximize AI citation probability in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews using real evidence instead of fabrication shortcuts.
Inputs
- · Page URL or content body
- · Target query/topic for AI (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Overviews)
- · Brand/site context
Outputs
- · GEO Score (0-100) broken into 4 pillars (Evidence Density 35%, Structure 25%, Authority 25%, Crawlability 15%)
- · Veto checks (auto-cap at 60 if failures detected)
- · Per-item fix recommendations
Requires
- · WebFetch or firecrawl (content retrieval)
- · Optional: GEO techniques reference from repo
Preconditions
- · Content must not fabricate quotes or statistics
- · Page must be crawlable by GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended
- · Author identity or first-party credentials must be present
Failure modes
- · Fabricated quotes/stats (exposes to FTC §5 liability)
- · Blocked AI crawlers in robots.txt
- · Title-content intent mismatch (clickbait auto-veto)
- · Self-contradictory data on page
- · Missing author or anonymous posting
Trust signals
- · Princeton/GA Tech KDD 2024 and CMU AutoGEO ICLR 2026 research citations
- · Explicit non-fabrication stance backed by FTC liability explanation
- · C-SEO Bench NeurIPS 2025 citation (fabrication lift evaporates under competition)
- · Structured GEO Signal Stack with weighted pillars
- · Veto checks as hard cap mechanism (auto-60 ceiling if YMYL/blocked/mismatched)